What’s expected of you?

Professional responsibilities and competencies.

SAFEGUARDING RESPONSE

Always act in a way that prioritises safety, dignity and respect.
Do no harm.

Accountabilities and competencies

Professional practice at entry level requires many skills and attributes. Here is a selection of the most important for your role: 

Key principles to remember 

  • You don’t need certainty of harm or risk to act.  

  • Early action / intervention can prevent harm. 

  • Safety is the priority. 

  • Work within your role. 

  • When in doubt, seek support. 

Ehara taku toa i te toa takitahi, engari he toa takitini.

My strength is not that of one, but of many. 

Preparing for your role in identifying and assessing risk 

Before exploring your role in risk identification and assessment, please become familiar with these topics in Safeguarding: Foundational Information.

Ethical decision-making

Read and become familiar with the complexity of ethical decision-making.

Reflect on complex issues and dilemmas you’ve had to manage in the past, where there were compromises in the decision-making.  

  •  What worked well in that situation, that enabled a fair and appropriate decision? 

  • Where a situation didn’t get resolved effectively, what have you learned that you would do differently next time? 

These scenarios might prompt your thinking. 

Professional boundaries

Read about and consider what professional boundaries will keep you operating safely and effectively in your role.  

Note the examples of healthy professional boundaries provided.

Reflect on your current practice. 

Which of these boundaries do you have in place already 

  • How are they working for you? 

  • Which boundaries do you need to develop or embed?

  • How will you go about that?

Inclusiveness

Reflect on this statement: 

Inclusiveness goes beyond removing barriers. It’s about developing and providing services that make people feel like they’ve valued and they belong.” 

What does that mean in practice for you, as a safeguarding professional in Aotearoa New Zealand?  

Read about Inclusiveness and consider how to build these principles into your personal practice.

At the start of this kaupapa on risk identification and assessment, this observation was made. It relates to the final set of action points for you, in this module.

The Human Rights Commission notes there are significant gaps in: 

  • how services are being designed to reduce risk of violence, abuse and neglect for disabled people 

  • staff skills, knowledge, and attitudes 

  • how well services work together. 

These gaps make it harder for disabled people to get help and harder to stay safe.

They add to the risk.

Preparing for your role in identifying and assessing risk 

Before exploring your role in risk identification and assessment, please become familiar with these topics in Safeguarding: Foundational Information.

The video is about the murder of a young disabled man in the UK.  


Its purpose is to explore why the death occurred and what should have been in place to prevent it. 

It presents a safeguarding ethicaldilemma case, involving: 

  • the exploitation of a man with learning disabilities 

  • ethical tensions around ‘autonomy vs protection’ and ‘choice vs capacity’ 

  • multiagency failure 

  • what professionals should have done differently

 

The video makes for sobering viewing and you can opt out of this activity if you prefer

  • the content might disturb some viewers 

  • viewer discretion is advised. 

Complete the scenarios below, which will help you think about your role and responsibilities in safeguarding

Scenario 1: He keeps answering for her. 

Scenario 2: Something feels off, but there’s no single incident. 

Scenario 3: Everyone has a different piece of the picture. 

Scenarios 

The following scenarios enable you to consider various situations that you might encounter, and how your role in risk identification and (initial) assessment applies.

The Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) - Safeguarding Adults Video

As a safeguarding professional, please watch the video below. It’s about the murder of a young disabled man in the UK. Its purpose is to explore why the death occurred and what should have been in place to prevent it. 

The video presents a safeguarding ethicaldilemma case, involving: 

  • the exploitation of a man with learning disabilities 

  • ethical tensions around ‘autonomy vs protection’ and ‘choice vs capacity’ 

  • multiagency failure 

  • what professionals should have done differently

The video makes for sobering viewing and you can opt out of this activity if you prefer

  • the content might disturb some viewers '

  • viewer discretion is advised. 

The Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE), Safeguarding Adults: Lessons from the murder of Steven Hoskin (Updated), 2020.

This is an updated version of an original video first uploaded in 2015.

Trigger Warning / Content Notice 

  • This video contains references to the abuse, torture, and murder of a vulnerable adult with learning disabilities. It includes discussion of targeted harm, systemic failings, and safeguarding concerns that some viewers may find distressing or upsetting. 

  • The content is intended for educational purposes to support learning and improvement in safeguarding practice. Viewer discretion is advised, and you may wish to access support if you find this material difficult to engage with. 

Key learning messages

You don’t need proof before you act.  

Safeguarding risk is often identified through patterns, early awareness, consultation, and timely escalation — not immediate certainty or investigation.